Blog Home
Archives
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
Categories





Is Diversification Back?
Many financial advisors are currently trying to attract clients by offering non-traditional methods of investing. They justify these non-traditional approaches by claiming diversification among common asset classes is no longer effective.
Admittedly, diversification did not protect investor’s portfolios in 2008. The performance of all equity asset classes – such as large cap, mid cap, small cap, international, growth, and value stocks – declined in value between 34 and 43 percent in 2008. Thus, regardless of the equity classes within your portfolio, your losses were similar to other equity investors during the recent market pullback.
Does 2008 indicate that diversification is dead? Let’s examine how different asset categories have performed since the market turnaround on March 9, 2009:
Large Growth (measured by the Vanguard Growth Index): +51.08%
Large Value (the Vanguard Equity Income Index): +54.89%
Mid Growth (the Russell Mid Growth Index): +63.74%
Mid Value (the Russell Mid Value Index): +76.55%
Small Growth (the Russell 2000 Growth Index): +69.63%
Small Value (the Russell 2000 Value Index): +76.26%
International Growth (Vanguard International Growth Index): +74.63%
International Value (Vanguard International Value Index): +74.73%
Corporate Bonds (the Vanguard Corporate Bond ETF): +6.38%
Government Bonds (the Vanguard Government Bond ETF): +0.65%
International Bonds (the Vanguard International Bond ETF): +19.00%
Obviously, all equity asset classes have rebounded well. However, there is a 25.47 percent different between the top performing equity asset class (mid value) and the worst performing equity asset class (large growth). This is over only a six month period. Consequently, it is clear there has been a large amount of variance amongst the performance of the various equity asset classes during the recovery. I believe this is evidence that the traditional diversification strategy driving traditional financial planning methods is as relative and vital as ever. Don’t be tricked into believing the short-term, non-traditional approaches currently being promoted by financial planners who will say whatever it takes to get your business.